I develop the concept of the Generative Social Structure β a framework explaining how social systems persist and reorganise across changing institutional and technological environments.
This framework informs advisory work at the intersection of AI, learning, media, and institutional power.
Most theories of institutional collapse focus on what breaks. My research asks a different question: what persists β and why?
The Generative Social Structure (GSS) framework explains how distributed social logics survive institutional rupture and re-emerge across changing technological environments. It reframes how we understand resilience, adaptation, and transformation.
Theory first. Research second. Application third. That is the architecture of this work.
My research develops the concept of the Generative Social Structure (GSS) β a framework explaining how distributed social logics persist through institutional rupture and re-emerge across changing media and technological environments.
Most theories of institutional collapse focus on what breaks. The GSS framework asks a different question: what persists β and why? It identifies the mechanisms through which societies maintain coherence under pressure, and how those mechanisms adapt when the environment changes fundamentally.
The framework engages and extends Bourdieu, Mamdani, and Giddens β positioning the GSS as a contribution to, rather than a correction of, existing structural theory.
"Without strategic literacy, institutions react. With strategic literacy, they lead."
The difference is understanding β not just adoption.
These areas are connected through a shared concern with how social structures organise, persist, and transform under conditions of institutional and technological change.
A study exploring why young adults choose X over TikTok and vice versa, using Media Synchronicity Theory. Examines how convergence and conveyance processes drive platform preference among active users.
PublishedA comprehensive literature review examining how cultural affiliations, residential patterns, and areas of residence influence professional choices among immigrant communities in the Swedish labour market.
PublishedTracing the Somali institution of fadhi ku dirir from colonial oral poetry through radio, television, and contemporary social media β examining how oral deliberative traditions adapt to digital infrastructures.
PublishedTheorizing how dominant actors use temporal manipulation β delays, acceleration, and rhythm disruption β as a primary mechanism of control in digital political environments.
PublishedOrganizations rush to adopt AI tools without first developing the institutional literacy to use them responsibly. The problem is not technical β it is structural.
AI & Institutions βEffective digital learning requires rethinking the architecture of knowledge exchange β not just delivering existing content through new platforms.
EdTech βThe assumption that social media democratizes voice misses how algorithmic architectures actively structure what can be said, by whom, and when.
Platform Power βI am a theory-building scholar working at the intersection of digital systems, learning, and institutional power. My core contribution is the Generative Social Structure (GSS) framework β a theory of how social logics persist and reorganize through rupture.
My academic and professional journey spans cultural studies, communication theory, and digital learning systems β forming the interdisciplinary foundation from which the GSS framework is built. The theory emerged from comparative work on Somalia, with probes into Kenya, Egypt, Yemen, South Sudan, and the Arabian Peninsula.
Alongside academic work, I have worked in primary education, community development, cross-cultural engagement, and institutional coordination across Sweden and internationally.
A free, twice-weekly homework support programme for children in Hisingen, Gothenburg β run in partnership with Bostads AB Poseidon. Bridging the gap between institutional education and community learning, bringing academic support directly to where families live.
This work is the practical expression of the belief that educational equity begins in the community β not the classroom.
Theoretical work on institutional power and democratic deliberation is grounded in direct participation β as an election official, and as an elected representative in cooperative governance.
This is not incidental. The GSS framework's core principles β distributed trust, oral deliberation, and collective responsibility β are not abstractions. They are mechanisms I have observed and operated within across democratic and civic institutions in Sweden and Europe.
Governance credibility in this work comes from both scholarly analysis and institutional participation. These roles represent that second dimension.
Let's build that understanding together.